Core Questions In Philosophy Sober Edition 507
Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings, Edition 6 - Ebook written by Elliott Sober. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings, Edition 6.
I know I've deleted questions in the past - questions which at the time seemed perfectly OK but a few hours later seemed pretty dumb. As the asker of a question, I would be pretty upset if I felt I no longer had control over my own questions. The asker of a question has some special privileges on their own question, including the right to accept whatever answer they like, even if the rest of the world things it is a crap answer. Microsoft visual c 2010 express manual pdf. For my money, I think that should extend to the power of ultimate veto over the question as a whole.–Feb 5 '16 at 18:31. In this case, I undeleted the question because I hate seeing when people try to take their ball and go home. With your edits, it's not a terrible question, and your answer provides general value.Had your answer been upvoted (as it is now), they would not have been able to delete their question. As part of a recent discussion about this,.
Not saying that's the best solution, just something we could think about here.As for the user, self-deletions count against you in the question-ban heuristics, so if they do this repeatedly they will quickly find themselves unable to ask any questions at all. That's a measure intended to curb this kind of abuse.We regularly decline flags from students who try to have moderators delete their questions if there's any value at all in the answers. If you do think there is value in a question or answer that a user has self-deleted, flag it and let us know why you think it should be undeleted. We can undelete if we think there's merit to your request. I see that this was not a clear-cut case because the original question was not an obvious “send me teh codez” question.In general, however, the best way to avoid such situations is to refrain from answering low-quality questions in the first place.
I rarely see selfish homework questions being asked as well-written posts so this heuristic works pretty well. If in doubt about the OP's attitude, for example, try commenting with a link to the suggesting them to improve their question. If they cannot be bothered to do so, they are probably not worth your time anyway. Just down-vote and walk away.If the question is valuable and you post a good answer, as soon as your answer gets the first up-vote, the OP will no longer be able to delete their question (see: “”). As a last resort, flag for moderator attention as was already suggested by Brad Larson.
Users don't need to try anything for their question to be narrowly scoped enough for Stack Overflow. Posting their attempt merely turns the question from a 'How to' question into a debugging style question. Debugging style questions can be too broad even with an MCVE, and 'How to' questions can be too broad without code, but a 'How to' question not having code does not in and of itself make the question too broad. With many 'how to' questions, code in the question is actually just noise. A lack of research (being easily googleable) is a downvote reason, not a close vote reason.– user4639281 Feb 5 '16 at 7:27. Sure, close it as a duplicate if there is one.
Close it as off-topic if it is off-topic. Close it as opinion based if it is opinion based.
Don't close it as too broad just because it doesn't contain code if it is otherwise narrowly scoped. Don't close it just because it is lacking in research effort. For the love of all that is good and honest in the world, don't close it as debugging/MCVE if it isn't a debugging question. Downvote questions that you think do not show any research effort, are unclear or not useful. Comment on any question you think can be improved.– user4639281 Feb 5 '16 at 7:42. I didn't say you should not close a question because of the size of the queue. I said you shouldn't be wasting close votes on questions which don't actually warrant close votes, while mentioning the size of the queue as one of the reasons why this should not be done.
If a question is actually too broad for stack overflow, close it as too broad, but don't base that decision solely off of whether or not the question contains code or shows research effort. Voting to Close a question for those reasons is doing a disservice to the asker, and the users in the queue who then have to vote leave open– user4639281 Feb 5 '16 at 8:22. Sometimes (though obviously not in this scenario) users will realize they have asked the wrong question. Often (exactly like exceptionally poor bug reports at Mozilla and perfect bug reports that get thrown out the window without the slightest regard irrespective of the intense amount of effort on the behalf of clarity and quality of the second bug poster) first posts are from what I've seen held in higher regard than quality posts in absolute, at least in my experience.
Musexsonar.weebly.comAll Categories - musexsonar800 × 1212 - 329k - jpgresearchgate.netPDF) THE NEW PHILOSOPHY OF CHEMISTRY AND ITS RELEVANCE TO CHEMICAL.850 × 1203 - 112k - pngresearchgate.netPDF) The Kuhnian Paradigm850 × 1203 - 92k - pngmusexsonar.weebly.comAll Categories - musexsonar149 × 198 - 10kresearchgate.netConvergence as Evidence Adrian Currie850 × 1203 - 188k - pngdarwin-online.org.ukHumboldt, Alexander von. Personal narrative of travels.1055 × 1699 - 283k - jpgresearchgate.netPDF) The influence of Niels Bohr on Max Delbr端ck: revisiting the.850 × 1100 - 78k - pngdarwin-online.org.ukSeward, A. Darwin and modern science. Essays in.876 × 1305 - 391k - jpgoll.libertyfund.org0199ToC.jpg300 × 417 - 32k - jpgdarwin-online.org.ukCuvier, Georges.
Core Questions In Philosophy Sober Edition 507 Free
The animal kingdom arranged in conformity.1032 × 1634 - 316k - jpgresearchgate.netEvolutionary Debunking Arguments and the Reliability of Moral.850 × 1263 - 114k - pngcambridge.orgHuman inference: The notion of reasonable rationality.800 × 1216 - 540k - jpgresearchgate.netPDF) Shared is not yet Sharing, Or: What Makes Social Net working.850 × 1203 - 105k - pngdarwin-online.org.ukHumboldt, Alexander von. Personal narrative of travels.1035 × 1688 - 125k - jpgerrorstatistics.comError Statistics Philosophy1196 × 612 - 254k - pngresearchgate.netPDF) Benjamin Rush's educational campaign against hard drinking850 × 1171 - 350k - pngamazon.com21 Lessons for the 21st Century - Kindle edition by Yuval Noah.333 × 500 - 23k - jpgcambridge.orgDomain-Specific Feedback (Part II) - The Cambridge Handbook of.1623 × 1137 - 860k - pngdarwin-online.org.ukHumboldt, Alexander von. Personal narrative of travels.1036 × 1688 - 269k - jpgresearchgate.netPDF) The Battering of Informed Consent850 × 1202 - 146k - png.